On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com> wrote: > On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote: >> >> Hi team >> >> I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference >> between >> >> IMAGE_INSTALL_append >> >> and >> >> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL >> >> Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should >> only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in >> the Build Directory. >> >> When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce >> bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really >> hard time few weekends ago because of this. >> >> I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug > > > The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with > the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL.
its not required to. > > I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch) > No. Its not OE-Core or yocto bug > BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development list. its valid for meta-xfce only. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto