On 10/28/2016 04:20 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote:
Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
needs to be set up a bit differently.
FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra.
I don't disagree :-) But it would be good to know more about the rest of
the infrastructure before adding (or reviewing) bits and pieces that by
themselves don't do much.
I start of with basic support and refine over time. Your statement can
apply for many components within meta-secuirty. I recently started
adding test images. Providing configurations or solutions for a niche
area is outside the scope for this general layer, IMHO. I could be
convinced otherwise. I tend not to wait for 100% solution before
sending out bits for review.
thanks for your input.
Regards,
Armin
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
