> On Oct 28, 2016, at 8:41 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 10/28/2016 04:20 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: >>>> Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in >>>> meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is >>>> a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also >>>> needs to be set up a bit differently. >>> FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra. >> I don't disagree :-) But it would be good to know more about the rest of >> the infrastructure before adding (or reviewing) bits and pieces that by >> themselves don't do much. > I start of with basic support and refine over time. Your statement can apply > for many components within meta-secuirty. I recently started adding test > images. Providing configurations or solutions for a niche area is outside the > scope for this general layer, IMHO. I could be convinced otherwise. I tend > not to wait for 100% solution before sending out bits for review.
its a good start. If you have some more patches on the way to complete the solution, that would be good to share. > > thanks for your input. > > Regards, > Armin >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
