On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 09:34:50AM -0500, Adam Meyerowitz wrote:
> Where does one find more information about miniRTL 2.0?

   http://www.thinkingnerds.com/projects/minirtl/minirtl.html  

Nice work.

> 
> Thanks
> Adam
> 
> 
> At 03:32 PM 11/16/99 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 02:47:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> THANKS, Stuart and GN DeSouza for the table posted comparing RTL & RTAI in
> >> such a basic and cogent way!  A first question about it:
> >>         Under the column 486, RTL v2 with linux kernel 2.2.x reads "n" =>
> >> presumably meaning this does not run on 486's.  But is that true?  I've run
> >> miniRTL 2.0 derived directly from RTL 2.0, with kernel 2.2.13 on a
> Pentium I.   
> >
> >The table  is not correct. We do great on 486s now. 
> >
> >> 
> >> Either way, this table would be great in THE RT MANUAL, with a change in
> >> header(s) so as to include 586es.  I could help with the manual too, but
> >> again as noviate.
> >> 
> >> Dr. S.C.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> At 02:54 PM 16-11-1999 +0000, you wrote:
> >> >Hi Gloria,
> >> >
> >> >I have forwarded a table previously posted on the RTL list.
> >> >
> >> >Stuart.
> >> >
> >> >Gl�ria wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Hello:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Is there any document about the differences betwen RTL and RTAI?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Thanks in advance.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> --
> >> >> Gl�ria Hern�ndez Ballester
> >> >> 
> >> >> e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Received: from rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu (rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu [129.138.6.62]) by
> >> hinge.mistral.co.uk (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA15859; Thu, 7 Oct 1999
> >> 19:46:31 +0100
> >> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:35:38 -0500 (EST)
> >> >From: Guilherme Nelson DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Reply-To: Guilherme Nelson DeSouza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Subject: [rtl] Table, API
> >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> >Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> >
> >> >Content-MD5: rhcKNx2XyqRpurLqxAPS+g==
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Again, thanks to those who sent corrections/suggestions.
> >> > 
> >> > The table and API-differences below are getting smoother.
> >> >I hope it has converged to something useful to other people
> >> >in this list.
> >> >
> >> > As we all (probably) expected, the differences between RTL
> >> >and RTAI are NOT that many (refer to RTLv2 and RTAIv6). As
> >> >a matter of fact, in my opinion the "only" discussion in this
> >> >list should be around POSIX compliance, once that this should
> >> >be the common denominator and, at the same time, the unifier
> >> >between both implementations. Other than that there are some
> >> >"unimportant" details such as unified header files, similar
> >> >installations, etc. But yet, that should come naturally after.
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> >    Guilherme
> >> >    
> >> >    
> >>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >> >|     | I | S | Sched.  | S |Po-  |pthre|F   | Shr| FP | GPL | Ker-  | 486
> >> | PPC |
> >> >|     | P | e |    |    | M | six |    -| I  | Mem|    |     |  nel  |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     | C | m |Per.| OS | P |     |ads  |  FO|    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >>
> >-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >> >|     |   |   |    |    |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >| RTL | o | o | w/ | w/ | n |  *  |  n  | y  | o  | y  |  y  | 2.0.x |  y
> >> |  n  |
> >> >| v1  |   |   |8254|8254|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |    |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >> >|     |   |   |    | w/ |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |8254|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    | +  |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> | in  |
> >> >|     |   |   | w/ |TSC |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >| RTL | o | o |    |    | y |  *  | **  | y  | o  | y  |  y  | 2.2.x |  n
> >> |deve-|
> >> >| v2  |   |   |8254|APIC|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    | in |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |lopm.|
> >> >|     |   |   |    |SMP |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |    |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >> >|     |   |   |    |8254|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    | in |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |UP -|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |SMP |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   | w/ | &  |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |  y
> >> |     |
> >> >| RTAI| y | y |    |MUP | y |  *  | **  | y  | o  | y  |  y  | 2.2.x |
> >> |  n  |
> >> >| v.6 |   |   |8254|    |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |(for
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |APIC|   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |1
> >> CPU|     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    | in |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |
> >> |only)|     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |SMP |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    | &  |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >> >|     |   |   |    |MUP |   |     |     |    |    |    |     |       |
> >> |     |
> >>
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -------
> >> >
> >> > y - embeded in the RT modules
> >> > n - not implemented
> >> > o - optional (it can be "insmod'ed" separately)
> >> > * - in RTAI, a POSIX lite API is implemented on top of the original API
> >> >     in RTL, the original API is implemented on top of a POSIX lite API.
> >> >** - RTAI - dynamic thread creation, conditional variables and priority
> >> >            inheritance mutex,
> >> >     RTL - static thread creation.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Original API comparison
> >> >=======================
> >> >
> >> >  What follows is a comparison btw the two original APIs (RTAI
> >> >and RTLv1). We are not listing the POSIX (lite) API present in
> >> >both recent releases of RTAI and RTL.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >set up peridic mode
> >> >------------------                 
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >  RTIME task_ticks;
> >> >        task_ticks = (RT_TICKS_PER_SEC/FREQ);
> >> >  rtl_set_periodic_mode(task_ticks);
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:     
> >> >  RTIME task_ticks;
> >> >  rt_set_periodic_mode(void);
> >> >  task_ticks = nano2count(1000000000/FREQ)
> >> >        start_rt_timer(task_ticks)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Tell Linux you will be using the FPU
> >> >--------------------------------------        
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >        ??
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:
> >> >  rt_linux_use_fp(1)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >initialise a task
> >> >-----------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >        rt_task_init(   RT_TASK *task,
> >> >                  void (*fn)(int),
> >> >                  int data,
> >> >                  int stack_size,
> >> >                  int priority )
> >> >
> >> >        If it uses the FPU, add:
> >> >
> >> >        rt_task_use_fp( RT_TASK *task, 1 )
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:
> >> >  rt_task_init(   RT_TASK *task,
> >> >                        void (*fn)(int),
> >> >                  int data,
> >> >                  int stack_size,
> >> >                  int priority,
> >> >                  int uses_fpu,
> >> >                  void (*signal)(void) )
> >> >                          
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >set a (periodic) task running
> >> >-----------------------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL/RTAI:
> >> >  
> >> >  rt_task_make_periodic( RT_TASK *task,
> >> >                          RTIME start_time_ticks,
> >> >                          RTIME period_ticks)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >suspend a running task until the next tick
> >> >-------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >  rt_task_wait(void)
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:
> >> >  rt_task_wait_period(void)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >cleanup/stop a task
> >> >--------------------
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:             stop_rt_timer(void)
> >> >RTL/RTAI: rt_task_suspend(RT_TASK *task)
> >> >          rt_task_delete( RT_TASK *task)
> >> >  
> >> >
> >> >create a fifo
> >> >--------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >          rtf_create(unsigned int fifo, int fifo_size)
> >> >                    
> >> >RTAI:
> >> >          rtf_create_using_bh(unsigned int, int size, 0)
> >> >
> >> >NOTE: both can be used with the simple rtf_create, but the behaviour is
> >> >different.  Under RTAI, a user task will only be woken up at the next
> >> >run of schedule (this is an intended feature).  To get the same effect
> >> >of waking up as soon as possible, use the above code.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >put data to a fifo
> >> >-------------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL/RTAI:
> >> >          rtf_put(unsigned int fifo, void *buf, int count)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >get data from a fifo
> >> >----------------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL/RTAI:
> >> >          rtf_get(usigned int fifo, void *buf, int count)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >destroy a fifo
> >> >---------------
> >> >
> >> >RTL/RTAI:
> >> >          rtf_destroy(usigned int fifo)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Filename comparison
> >> >===================
> >> >
> >> >Another problem is the name and location of files. This means that
> >> >Makefiles and code has to be changed to locate the different include
> >> >files. 
> >> >
> >> >Header names
> >> >-----------
> >> >
> >> >RTL:
> >> >  rtl_fifo.h, rtl_sched.h
> >> >
> >> >RTAI:
> >> >  rtai_fifos.h, rtai_sched.h
> >> >
> >> >Note: in addition you must also include rtai.h first for RTAI.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >           -------------< G. N. DeSouza >-------------
> >> >           ---------< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>---------
> >> >           --< http://rvl1.ecn.purdue.edu/~gnelson >--
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >           -------------< G. N. DeSouza >-------------
> >> >           ---------< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>---------
> >> >           --< http://rvl1.ecn.purdue.edu/~gnelson >--
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--- [rtl] ---
> >> >To unsubscribe:
> >> >echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> >> >echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >----
> >> >For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> >> >http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> >> --- [rtl] ---
> >> To unsubscribe:
> >> echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> >> echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> ----
> >> For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> >> http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
> >--- [rtl] ---
> >To unsubscribe:
> >echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> >echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >----
> >For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> >http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
> >
> --- [rtl] ---
> To unsubscribe:
> echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
> echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----
> For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
> http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/

Reply via email to