Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
Speaking with my Geronimo hat on, I'd have to say that requiring a
custom OCI plugin get written is not an acceptable solution. Adding
the appropriate hooks is not that big of a change to the IIOP
code....I had support for a plugin-to-the-plugin roughed out in just
a day that met all of the Geronimo requirements I stated above. I
shelved this solution pending checking of the secure transport code
you said you were working one.
I think we should use your solution. The solution I have is aimed at
stand-alone CSI operation. I think we should get your
plugin-to-the-plugin in the repo.
Should I directly implement my plugin-to-the-plugin without waiting for
your solution? It sounded to me like your design was flexible enough to
be extended by the same hooks.
Good job, btw.
Regards,
Anders
