Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm working on a transient NameService implementation that can be used
by Geronimo, and I suddenly find myself seriously confused on what
version of the org.omg.* classes we should be using, particularly when
compared with the Geronimo spec versions. For example, in the
Geronimo 3.0 spec tree, there is are org.omg.CORBA, org.omg.CORBA_2_3,
and org.omg.CORBA_2_5. In the Yoko tree, we have CORBA, CORBA_2_3 and
CORBA_2_4. Also, there's no CosNaming package in the Yoko tree, which
I'll need to write the NamingService. Also, unfortunately, I would
really like to be able to use the CORBA_2_5 version of ORB, since that
adds the register_initial_reference method to the public interface.
What should we be using here? Would it be appropriate to pull in the
Geronimo CORBA 3.0 tree and build the classes that way?
Rick
Rick,
I don't see a Jira issue for this piece of work.
I'm really worried that people are doing work on things and not
discussing it first on this list. If we file Jiras it will be a simple
way of driving a stake in the ground and announcing to the community
what you're doing. It will also provide a way for people to submit
comments and for us to track your commits related to that work.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
