Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm working on a transient NameService implementation that can be
used by Geronimo, and I suddenly find myself seriously confused on
what version of the org.omg.* classes we should be using,
particularly when compared with the Geronimo spec versions. For
example, in the Geronimo 3.0 spec tree, there is are org.omg.CORBA,
org.omg.CORBA_2_3, and org.omg.CORBA_2_5. In the Yoko tree, we have
CORBA, CORBA_2_3 and CORBA_2_4. Also, there's no CosNaming package
in the Yoko tree, which I'll need to write the NamingService. Also,
unfortunately, I would really like to be able to use the CORBA_2_5
version of ORB, since that adds the register_initial_reference method
to the public interface.
What should we be using here? Would it be appropriate to pull in the
Geronimo CORBA 3.0 tree and build the classes that way?
Rick
Rick,
I don't see a Jira issue for this piece of work.
I'm really worried that people are doing work on things and not
discussing it first on this list. If we file Jiras it will be a
simple way of driving a stake in the ground and announcing to the
community what you're doing. It will also provide a way for people to
submit comments and for us to track your commits related to that work.
Thoughts?
Oops, having a senior moment here....I thought I HAD already opened a
JIRA for this. I agree with everything you've said above.
Rick
Regards,
Alan
