This reflects my sentiments as well.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I agree, it would be excellent to have comprehensive
documentation. For now, the software is complete and well tested,
which is a lot more than I personally expect from 1.0 software.
When we do get better documentation, we can quickly release a 1.1.
-dain
On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Lars Kühne wrote:
IMHO what's really missing for a 1.0 final release is the
documentation. I started some of it in the old wiki (http://
wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko/OrbConfiguration), but that needs
to be migrated to cwiki or the distribution tar ball.
Any chance that IONA would donate some of their docs? That would
be so much easier than trying to figure out the exact meaning of
each configuration option by reading the code.
-Lars
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think we should release 1.0 final. The ORB is totally working
now and it has been throughly tested by the J2EE 1.4 tck.
-dain
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Geronimo has made great progress on the TCK using Yoko, and
we're starting to put things together for 1.2 release. For the
1.2 Beta release Geronimo shipped with an interim snapshot
version, but for the final 1.2 release, we'd like to use an
actual release version. Can we get the process started to ship
an M2 release? And more importantly, can we get it released in
a more timely fashion than was done for the M1 release?
Rick
