On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoko depends on current snapshot of cxf. I believe cxf is planning
to release RC end of the month. So it might be worth coordinating
yoko 1.0 with CXF.
Dain, does geronimo 1.2 depend on CXF?
no. We'd be pretty happy with a release of the parts of yoko that
don't depend on cxf.
thanks
david jencks
Thanks,
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-----Original Message-----
From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:54:40
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: Request for creating the M2 release.
That doesn't really work for me. I'd like to release Geronimo 1.2 in
the next two weeks and we need to the latest yoko code to pass the
tck. How about we release 1.0 now and a 1.0.1 refresh when the tools
have been improved. If it is only 4 weeks between release, that is
great. Users love it when projects release early *and* often :)
-dain
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Also, I think the other components of yoko (binding & the tools)
can be made stable if given some time.
How about sometime around March end? Is that a reasonable time frame?
- Balaji
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 1:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Request for creating the M2 release.
This reflects my sentiments as well.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I agree, it would be excellent to have comprehensive
documentation. For now, the software is complete and well tested,
which is a lot more than I personally expect from 1.0 software.
When we do get better documentation, we can quickly release a 1.1.
-dain
On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Lars Kühne wrote:
IMHO what's really missing for a 1.0 final release is the
documentation. I started some of it in the old wiki (http://
wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko/OrbConfiguration), but that needs
to be migrated to cwiki or the distribution tar ball.
Any chance that IONA would donate some of their docs? That would
be so much easier than trying to figure out the exact meaning of
each configuration option by reading the code.
-Lars
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think we should release 1.0 final. The ORB is totally working
now and it has been throughly tested by the J2EE 1.4 tck.
-dain
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Geronimo has made great progress on the TCK using Yoko, and
we're starting to put things together for 1.2 release. For the
1.2 Beta release Geronimo shipped with an interim snapshot
version, but for the final 1.2 release, we'd like to use an
actual release version. Can we get the process started to ship
an M2 release? And more importantly, can we get it released in
a more timely fashion than was done for the M1 release?
Rick
