On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:55:26PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 19:43 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > > 1. supporting gpg/x509 signatures detached from repomd.xml on each repo
> > > - so we can check the content for validity
> > 
> > Is sqlite repo-data still on your list or have you changed
> > your mind on this?
> > 
> 
> it's already in place.
> 
> that's in 3.1.X.

Ok, good.

> 
> this is about verifying the repomd.xml for integrity of the repo,
> independent of just data integrity.

Yes, that's really needed.

regards,

Florian La Roche

_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel

Reply via email to