On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 22:23 -0400, James Bowes wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:53 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >> I was thinking some about 3.2.x and after. So a couple of options: > > [snip] > >> 2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD > >> but w/o breaking the API while we stabilize and work on new items. > > > > So I've alluded to this some, but I really lean towards this option. > > I was telling seth to branch for 3.2 earlier, but I really meant to tag > it now, as I think we're stable enough for the release. > > Working from head sounds fine, just as long as we (seth) are prepared to > release a 3.2.x.y for some bug fix (or just patch the rpm in the spec. > whatever.)
Nothing says we can't branch off of a release tag for a one off like that.. the goal would be to not have a lot of those, though ;-) Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
