On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>
> > * yum list vendors
> > List install packages and the rpm vendors, there have been a lot of
> > discussions on the EPEL list, about repotag as a way to locate the
> > source of the packages, because the basic packages tools like yum
> > don't show it in a simple way.
>
> Can't repoquery do this?
I think the point there is that we want to list the vendor at all times
whenever we display the package name.
The example given was something like this:
core os package: foo-1.0-1.fc6.i386.rpm files: /bin/file1, /bin/file2
evil repo package: foo-1.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm files: /bin/file1, /bin/file2,
/bin/file3
good repo package: bar-1.0-1.fc6.i386.rpm files: /bin/file3, /bin/file4
user does:
1) install system
2) configure evil repo
3) yum upgrade (upgrades foo)
4) configure good repo
5) yum install bar
WTF?! Why does the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ "bar" package in "good" repo conflict
with
my BASE OS package "foo"??? Dont they even test this stuff?
The user then proceeds to berate admin of good repo, even though it was
actually evil repo's fault.
If, when you gave the conflict message ("/bin/file3 from package foo
conflicts with /bin/file3 from package bar"), you also mentioned the
vendor, that might allevate some problems. ("/bin/file3 from package
foo, vendor 'evil repo' conflicts with file /bin/file3 from package bar,
vendor 'goot repo'")
--
Michael
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
