On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:04:44PM +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > This raise some questions where we want to go with the yum devlopment: > * What do we want add to the current 3.2.x > * When do we want too make a new unstable branch and what feature do we > want to add. > > Brainstorming: > * better, cleaner, faster depsolver. > * more unittest testcases, not only the lowlevel API but also the > highlevel stuff (YumBase: update, remove, install etc) > * http://wiki.linux.duke.edu/YumTodo > * cleanup the logging and make it more simple (do we need all that > logging levels, something like quiet, normal, verbose, debug should be > enough (--quiet, -v -vv ) > * cleanup the API and maybe move some code from yum-cli to YumBase to > make it easier to use the Yum api, without needing a lot of code from yum > cli. > * yum gui api to make it easier to use yum api from gui apps. > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TimLauridsen/YumGuiBackBone) > * Document the API. > * Localization > * Multiarch handling, sould it be different than today. > * Add your own ideas here. > * And here too
I agree with all of these, especially localization. Does it make sense to start an unstable branch now for F9/EL6? I'd love to remove all of the deprecated stuff and cut down on the number of package classes. -James
pgpWdlGsYe6kU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
