On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 08:04 +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:36 -0500, James Bowes wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:22:42AM +0100, Tim Lauridsen wrote: > > > > > > > I have created at patch to add skip-broken functionality to YumBase. > > > > > > > While I'm not against adding skip-broken to core yum, or other things > > > like downgrades and pinning (though others may disagree ;) ), I don't > > > know how comfortable I am adding features to the depsolver right now vs > > > hardening the existing behaviour and speeding it up. > > > > > > > > > > not to mention that skip-broken internally equivalently makes our > > progress bars go backward :( > > > > -sv > > > > > Maybe its to early in the morning for me, but i don't have a clue what > you are talking about :) :) >
Progress events for depsolving. It seems like if we're restarting the depsolve process in that way we'll end up with reducing how much progress we've made. so we'll have a progress bar which goes: =====================> ========================> ================> ======================> =========================> =================> ================> or maybe I'm just thinking about it oddly. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
