On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:26 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 02:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > It's either too late or night or I'm losing my mind: > > > > For cases where matching case insensitively nor matching against a > > subset of packages from any given sack are not at issue why are we using > > packages.parsePackages() vs just using sackobject.matchPackageNames() > [snip] > > I don't remember having this conversation before so I'm thinking some of > > it just legacy hang-around. I know why parsePackages exists - it's so we > > can case insensitive matches - but we're never going to do that for > > update/install/remove so that doesn't matter. > > Isn't one of them faster? I have a vague recollection of looking into > something along these lines ~ 6 months or so ago >
well parsePackages should be slower by a bit if only b/c it has to generate those big lists and then match each of them. However the case matching is important for searches and what-not. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
