On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:47:53AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > I had a silly thought as the year ticked over last night. - Would it > make sense for us to put in an update nag for yum in yum with a hard > date in it. So, for example, if 3.2.12 is released in march 2008, we > have a check in the startup of the code that says 'if the date is > > march 2011, print out a nag warning to stderr that this version of yum > is quite old and maybe you should look for a newer one or ask your > distribution vendor for an update'. It'd be easy to disable, of course, > but it might be worth while just to catch people like those we know are > still running rhl9 or fc1. > So, silly thought?
Sounds like a plug-in to me. :) -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
