On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 08:55 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:47:53AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > I had a silly thought as the year ticked over last night. - Would it > > make sense for us to put in an update nag for yum in yum with a hard > > date in it. So, for example, if 3.2.12 is released in march 2008, we > > have a check in the startup of the code that says 'if the date is > > > march 2011, print out a nag warning to stderr that this version of yum > > is quite old and maybe you should look for a newer one or ask your > > distribution vendor for an update'. It'd be easy to disable, of course, > > but it might be worth while just to catch people like those we know are > > still running rhl9 or fc1. > > So, silly thought? > > Sounds like a plug-in to me. :) >
no, it can't be a plugin, that just screws it. B/c then we'd have to ship the plugin by default and that would mean doom and pain. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
