On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 08:54 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I guess my question is: What is the future of PackageKit from the > yum-updatesd developers' point of view? Is PackageKit going to be the > default sooner or later, with everything talking to it? There seems to be > quite a bit of duplication of functionality with yum-updatesd but a broader > mandate. Is there a plan/intention to move yum-updatesd to be a PackageKit > client, or will they remain (presumably friendly) competitors?
I don't think packagekit matters from a yum-updatesd standpoint. Moreover, unless I've misunderstood I don't see packagekit being useful w/o user interaction. Part of the point of yum-updatesd is to take care of servers, too. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
