Hi Seth,
Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2008 schrieb seth vidal:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:42 +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > With pleasure from my side, but probably not from yours, since they're
> > a mess... Attached.
>
> okay, I see the exclude containing kernel-* in update.repo.
>
> Can you try a couple of things for me:
With pleasure.
> 1. make the line that was the exclude read:
> exclude=opal* pwlib* wine python-qt* samba-vscan kernel*
>
> so that is removing the - following kernel
I should have mentioned, that I had it like this primary, similar to the
other ex. The version containing the dash was the second try already.
Tried it again, with no behavioral changes.
> 2. if that doesn't work - take off the *. I want to figure out which
> piece is failing in the matching routine.
Now I made it read like this:
exclude=opal* pwlib* wine python-qt* samba-vscan kernel-bigsmp kernel-source
kernel-syms
I.e. with the exact matches, but again, no behavioral change.
Now I excluded a package ready to update from a different repo, that
matched as expected, even with wildcards.
Looks like one of the exactarchlist, installonlypkgs or kernelpkgnames
options is responsible for this issue.
While my SUSE package contains a patch from Christoph Thiel, I reverted
it temporarily to be sure, it's not the culprit:
--- yum/rpmsack.py
+++ yum/rpmsack.py
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
ts = self.readOnlyTS()
result = {}
- mi = ts.dbMatch('basenames', name)
+ mi = ts.dbMatch('basenames', name.encode('us-ascii'))
for hdr in mi:
pkg = self._makePackageObject(hdr, mi.instance())
if not result.has_key(pkg.pkgid):
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
ts = self.readOnlyTS()
result = {}
tag = self.DEP_TABLE[prcotype][0]
- mi = ts.dbMatch(tag, name)
+ mi = ts.dbMatch(tag, name.encode('us-ascii'))
for hdr in mi:
po = self._makePackageObject(hdr, mi.instance())
prcotup = (name, None, (None, None, None))
but that results only in a traceback like this:
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package kernel-syms.i586 0:2.6.18.8-0.8 set to be updated
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in <module>
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:])
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 236, in user_main
errcode = main(args)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 151, in main
(result, resultmsgs) = base.buildTransaction()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 576, in
buildTransaction
(rescode, restring) = self.resolveDeps()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 738, in
resolveDeps
CheckDeps, checkinstalls, checkremoves, missing =
self._resolveRequires(errors)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 824, in
_resolveRequires
thisneeds = self._checkInstall(txmbr)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 865, in
_checkInstall
if req in oldreqs and self.rpmdb.getProvides(*req):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 401, in
getProvides
pkgs = self.searchProvides(name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 165, in
searchProvides
return self.searchPrco(name, 'provides')
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 140, in
searchPrco
mi = ts.dbMatch(tag, name)
TypeError: unknown key type
Okay, for some reason, the SUSE rpm database has a different encoding
then. Let's ignore this for now.
Do you have more ideas on what to try next?
Thanks for your patience,
Pete
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
