On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:18 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, James Antill wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 09:56 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, James Antill wrote: > >>> Can we only do this if "tags" is in the fields? > >> > >> why? > > > > So we can easily turn it on/off. > > why would we need to? What do we lose by having it on? If the tags aren't > available in the repomd.xml then it won't fetch anything else.
Just from an API point of view, callers will want to be able to search just name/summary (hopefully PK already has this requirement) ... dito. the other way where they want to search just tags. It just seems much easier to add a fake "tags" field now, than end up having to create a searchGeneratorNoTags() API at some point later. _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
