On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ales Kozumplik <akozu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > I am facing licensing problems trying to submit DNF (a fork of yum) as a > package to Fedora. The whole situation was brought to light by Terje > Røsten[sic][1] , specifically the problem is that few files are missing > the license preambles at their top (and it is thus not 100% clear what > license they are under). The files are: > > yum/misc.py > yum/parser.py > rpmUtils/arch.py > > I talked to Tom Callaway and he suggested contacting the yum devel list. > Could one of the maintainers please confirm that the mentioned files are > licensed the same way as the rest of the project (GPLv2), or otherwise > clarify their licensing conditions? > > Many thanks, > Ales > > [1] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=833511#c10<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511#c10> > ______________________________**_________________ > Yum-devel mailing list > Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org > http://lists.baseurl.org/**mailman/listinfo/yum-devel<http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel> > Yum is licensed under GPLv2+ (GPL Version 2 or later) even if every source file don't have the license preambles at their top. Tim
_______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list Yum-devel@lists.baseurl.org http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
