On 07/10/2012 07:51 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
This was initially checked in by Seth, and other files were checked in
with the preamble at the same time ... maybe Seth wants to confirm that
he didn't intent to make it something weird, but I'd assume so (and all
my contributions have been under that assumption).
I talked to Tom Callaway and he suggested contacting the yum devel list.
Could one of the maintainers please confirm that the mentioned files are
licensed the same way as the rest of the project (GPLv2), or otherwise
clarify their licensing conditions?
I don't see how they couldn't be.
Even if they aren't all licensed GPLV2 - what's the issue? Is the GPL
not compatible with the GPLV2? I don't recall that issue.
Seth,
there is not real issue per se. For the reviewer's piece of mind it
would be better if you explicitly confirmed (as the person who checked
in the files with missing preambles) that you didn't intend to put them
under a different license than the rest of the Yum project (GPLv2+).
Can you please confirm that?
Thank you,
Ales
_______________________________________________
Yum-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
