> I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the > rights to do so, unlike the Texas Motel Medley where he couldn't. I know that > some of the US releases of that tour were slightly different from the UK and > world releases because acquiring the rights to some tunes. Wasn't Bolero one > of them? > Lawyers is such crazy peoples!
Yes, the Bolero had to be removed from later pressings because Ravel's heirs didn't approve. And that's just one example of copyrights taken to the extreme... best wishes, Marco ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Everything you need is one�click away.� Make Yahoo! your home page�now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/yXLolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> For further Z-related fun, please visit http://www.thebignote.com or http://www.killuglyradio.com , thank you. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zappa-List/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
