Yes I agree with you. Present results show that the pure CFOP method yields incredible results. Any change to this method will probably make it slower I think.
Therefore we need to "think out of the box" and look for new ways of solving the cube. Gilles 2007/1/12, richy_jr_2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The group has been relatively mute for a while. The reasons why are many and varied, and I won't invest any time explaining as such. The problem in the inactivity is that it screams failure not only for the ZBmethod. It represents something far more important. This group represents a group of people that are willing to explore something new and innovative. I propose that we rename the group to relate the desire to explore new methods. I'm fairly certain this will raise the activity in this group, as well as giving cubers a good platform to discuss new things. No offense to anyone but the normal speedcubing group is quite possibly the worst medium available for discussing new approaches. I have talked to several people with method ideas that could inspire a major shift in traditional cubing -- Surely someone wants to play a role in this. Best Regards, Richard
