Anthony,

JMJM keeps quoting it because he keeps trying to awaken you.

Silly man!

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote:
>
> JM,
>  
> You say, 'Diamond Sutra said nothing.  It is just a tool for awakening.' If 
> so, why do you keep quoting it?
>  
> Are you aware that Diamond Sutra was composed at least 500 years after 
> Buddha's demise? That is a consensus of modern Buddhist scholars. 
> Nevertheless, it is an excellent sutra.
>  
> Anthony
> 
> --- On Fri, 20/5/11, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 <chan.jmjm@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 <chan.jmjm@...>
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Self Nature
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, 20 May, 2011, 10:39 PM
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> ED,
> 
> Thank you for your concern.  I thank you.  Let me say a few things about 
> the value of my posts.
> 
> 
> My teacher does not want us to record, memorize, take notes, catalog his 
> speeches, because when the moment passes, they are no longer valid, because 
> they will be out of context --- emotional, logical, sequential and 
> circumstantial context.  So did Buddha and Jesus.
> 
> My teacher always remind us that Diamond Sutra said nothing.  It is just a 
> tool for awakening.
> My posts are not mine.  Most of my posts are borrowed, copied, plagiarized 
> from some where.  They are very very narrow in scope, while I suppose to 
> cover ALL, because that is what Chan is.  Chan is ALL.  Therefore my posts 
> are always partial and incomplete by nature.
> 
> My posts server one purpose, to awaken someone.  Often that someone may not 
> be the person named in the post.  
> To conclude, my posts contains no value, especially after the effect.Thank 
> you for thinking of me. :-) 
> 
> Have a nice day.
> JM
> Learn to de-stress, energize and awaken
> http://www.chan-meditation.com
> Learn to live with Health, Happiness and Harmony
> http://www.chanliving.org
> Learn to reach enlightenment
> http://www.heartchan.org
> To save the world
> http://www.universal-oneness.org
> 
> 
> On 5/20/2011 6:27 AM, ED wrote: 
>   
> 
> 
> Bill,
> In your opinion, is this below an acceptable 'Zen' teaching, or is it an 
> unnecessary accretion to Zen?
> JMJM, the above is an honest and straightforward question, which I 
> hope does not offend you.
> Thanks, ED
>  
> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> >
> > > Our tradition's main emphasis is a practice. By focusing on our "heart" 
> > > to sync the "heart" of the universe, we shall witness self nature. Our 
> > > practitioners has also witness the heart to be the core, the chi, the 
> > > center, the essence, the love, the current, the energy, the big chakra, 
> > > the conduit, the whole being, the entirety, etc.
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to