Hi Kris,
Your good intentions terminated this thread from developing with your
usual "nonsense". Let me add my "nonsense".
I was on the verge to drive at the indescribable "causation", which is
the original definition of karma, while Edgar had a moralistic
interpretation of the word, because the concept of "karma" was hijacked
by people who intended to control.
Either way, it does not matter. All discussions are form. The key is
not to have a position. Once we have a position, we are discriminating
in form. Our pure heart is clouded by our thinking mind. Yet without a
position, it is difficult to communicate. Sigh...
Recently I shared another "nonsense", I wonder what does this forum say
about that -- we intuitively seek peace, happiness and love. They all
arise from our heart and not our mind. Our mind is nothing but a logic
processor.
My question is, "is the way I use the "mind" and the "heart" here
correct English?" If not, then please correct me.
Thanks,
jm
On 4/7/2012 9:11 AM, Kristopher Grey wrote:
On 4/7/2012 11:05 AM, 覺妙精明 wrote:
Is/Are there cause(s) for the actualization? From the Big Bang to
this and to that?
Conception of from and to, this and that... is actualization.
Conception of space and time, matter and energy... same.
If there was no time/space "before" the "Big Bang", what makes it
appears so "after"? What conceives of "before" and "after" - "time and
space" - matter and energy? What actualizes these reciprocal
functions? The mechanism of causation seems quite clear.
It's not whatever we may think it is, rather it's that we think at
all. The singularity is never not so. The
expansion/contraction/point/differentiation - same. Apparent aspects
of timeless dimensionless unity. Can't really work with that, use
that, identify with that, so we to see it otherwise. Not a choice,
this "Choiceless Awareness". Amazing.
Apologies in advance to Edgar, for sharing more "nonsense", which
surely this is. ;)
K
