JM Your use of the English word 'heart' is influenced by your Chinese meaning of 'xin'. What is the Chinese word for 'mind'? Anthony
________________________________ From: 覺妙精明 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, 8 April 2012, 22:11 Subject: Re: [Zen] Maybe Hi Kris, Your good intentions terminated this thread from developing with your usual "nonsense". Let me add my "nonsense". I was on the verge to drive at the indescribable "causation", which is the original definition of karma, while Edgar had a moralistic interpretation of the word, because the concept of "karma" was hijacked by people who intended to control. Either way, it does not matter. All discussions are form. The key is not to have a position. Once we have a position, we are discriminating in form. Our pure heart is clouded by our thinking mind. Yet without a position, it is difficult to communicate. Sigh... Recently I shared another "nonsense", I wonder what does this forum say about that -- we intuitively seek peace, happiness and love. They all arise from our heart and not our mind. Our mind is nothing but a logic processor. My question is, "is the way I use the "mind" and the "heart" here correct English?" If not, then please correct me. Thanks, jm On 4/7/2012 9:11 AM, Kristopher Grey wrote: >On 4/7/2012 11:05 AM, 覺妙精明 wrote: > >>Is/Are there cause(s) for the actualization? From the Big Bang to this and >>to that? >> >Conception of from and to, this and that... is actualization. > >Conception of space and time, matter and energy... same. > >If there was no time/space "before" the "Big Bang", what makes it appears so >"after"? What conceives of "before" and "after" - "time and space" - matter >and energy? What actualizes these reciprocal functions? The mechanism of >causation seems quite clear. > >It's not whatever we may think it is, rather it's that we think at all. The >singularity is never not so. The expansion/contraction/point/differentiation - >same. Apparent aspects of timeless dimensionless unity. Can't really work with >that, use that, identify with that, so we to see it otherwise. Not a choice, >this "Choiceless Awareness". Amazing. > >Apologies in advance to Edgar, for sharing more "nonsense", which surely this >is. ;) > >K >
