Hi Emilio,

Im using latest d/l 302, installed as a vm. When I setup an L4 farm with
DNAT enabled the farm does not respond, as soon as I change from DNAT to NAT
it immediately responds. Is there some suggestions you can give me in this
case?

Regards,
Grant


From:  Emilio Campos <[email protected]>
Reply-To:  <[email protected]>
Date:  Tuesday, 9 July, 2013 10:31 PM
To:  "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: [Zenloadbalancer-support] help

Hi

The only possible solution for your infraestructure with zen is to configure
a L4 farm with DNAT enabled, it implies your backends have to configure the
lb as the gw. 

If you can't modify the gw for backends try with a static route in your
backends.

Regards


2013/7/9 Deepak Prusty <[email protected]>
> Hey Martin,
>  
> I tried l4xnat option, it works. But I am not getting client ip addresses in
> my backend proxy servers I can only see the LB vip. I checked with both NAT
> and DNAT options, but I get only LB vip in the backend proxy servers. I was
> going through some of blogs, someone suggested making LB ip as default gateway
> for the real servers. If this is the only way to get the client IP in my real
> proxy servers, I think it would not work for me. Because, my backed servers
> are internet browsing proxy servers with single NIC and has to connect to
> internet using internet router as default gateway. Can you suggest me any
> better way to fix this?
>  
> Thanks,
> Deepak.
>  
> 
> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 20:32:09 +0200
> 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Zenloadbalancer-support] help
> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> A tcp farm works similar to L4TXNAT farm with nat option.
> 
> It has to work for you without change anything if tcp farm worked for you
> 
> El 07/07/2013 20:23, "Deepak Prusty" <[email protected]> escribió:
>> Hi Martin,
>>  
>> Please help me configuring if at all anything required to be configured in
>> proxy or browser. However, the same proxy and browser configuration works
>> perfectly fine with a TCP farm. As you know and as suggested by Nevola, since
>> tcp-farm is not able to handle the load and hence I am trying to load balance
>> my proxy servers using different available options. Is this a workable
>> solution, (I mean is this possible with http or L4 farm)? I think, I should
>> not be doing any change either in my proxy or client side browser, it should
>> work as it is working with a tcp-farm.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Deepak.
>>  
>> 
>> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:06:21 +0200
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Zenloadbalancer-support] help
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Prusty. L4 farm with DNAT enabled is your optimized configuration. If you
>> have problems with https conns pleache check your proxy or browser
>> configuration.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> El 07/07/2013 17:54, "Deepak Prusty" <[email protected]> escribió:
>>> Hi Nevola,
>>>  
>>> I tried using a HTTP farm as well as a L4 farm to load balance by proxy
>>> servers. In both the cases, I can browse all http websites using the http
>>> farm or L4 farm VIP as proxy IP. But problem is that neither http farm nor
>>> L4 farm works when I browse a secure website (HTTPS). i.e. None of the
>>> banking online site nor even facebook works. Need your guidance please.
>>>  
>>> Thanks,
>>> Deepak.
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: [Zenloadbalancer-support] help
>>> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 00:13:09 +0530
>>> 
>>> Thanks for replying, m certainly going to try that out and check the
>>> performance.
>>>  
>>> But, I am still wondering why pen-process is unable to utilize already
>>> available vCPUs.
>>>  
>>> Thanks,
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:37:17 +0200
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Zenloadbalancer-support] help
>>> 
>>> Hi Deepak, continuing with our conversation, for your configuration you've
>>> to setup a http farm which has already applied the Xforwarder-for header and
>>> for equal sharing you've to configure the same weight for every backend.
>>> This kind of farm provides much more performance than the TCP one for HTTP
>>> transactions.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Deepak Prusty <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hey Zen LB Masters, I need urgent help
>>>> 
>>>>  I am evaluating Zen-LB (open source). I have installed the cluster on 2
>>>> VMs (vmware platform) using the latest iso-v3.02. I am using it to load
>>>> balance my 8 proxy servers. When the total number of sessions gone high
>>>> (around 8000), the LB drastically slowed down. I found that the CPU is
>>>> choking at 100%, memory utilization not even touched 10%. On further
>>>> investigation I found that the vmware console is showing CPU utilization
>>>> only 30% for this VM but when i checked inside the VM using top command the
>>>> 'pen process' is consuming as high as 100% cpu. I am using a 4-vCPU,
>>>> 4GB-RAM VM and VMware tool also installed in it. I have checked by shifting
>>>> the load to other node in the Zen-cluster but no improvement. Am I missing
>>>> something in configuration?  How do I solve this problem?
>>>>  
>>>> When I investigated further found that, the 'pen' process is using only one
>>>> vCPU (out of 4) and utilizing it 100% hence becoming unresponsive within
>>>> few minutes. How do I resolve this issue?
>>>> 
>>>> I need to load balance 8 proxies with 'equal load sharing' and also want
>>>> X-forwarded-for options to get the real client IP in proxy for logging and
>>>> auditing purpose.
>>>> Need urgent help please. -- Thanks in advance.
>>>>        -Deeps.
>>>>        
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>>> 
>>>> Build for Windows Store.
>>>> 
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support
>>> mailing list 
>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
>>> ists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>>        
>>>        
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>> 
>>> Build for Windows Store.
>>> 
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> - This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support
>> mailing list 
>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/li
>> sts/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>>        
>> 
>> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
-
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>> 
>> Build for Windows Store.
>> 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support
> mailing list 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lis
> ts/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
>        
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
> 



-- 
Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project
http://www.zenloadbalancer.com
Distribution list (subscribe): [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get
end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate
bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of
AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_
______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support
mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support

Reply via email to