Hi Robby , there is not a best configuration for SSL traffic or other kind of farm, it depends what you want to do and what architecture you have.
If you want to keep the entire communication in ssl mode and persistence by IP is enough for you then L4 is your best option in my point of view. In the case you need to evaluate request or to read headers, then you need a HTTP profile. As you can see it will depend that you want to do. Regards 2014-08-14 14:48 GMT+02:00 Robby Pedrica <[email protected]>: > Hi all > > There are a number of options in ZLB to load balance HTTP SSL traffic eg: > > 1. tcp with port 443 > 2. l4xnat with DNAT and tcp port 443 > 3. http(s) with SSL offload > > The setup would be: > > internet <---> firewall <---> ZLB <---> real servers ( web with SSL ) > > I'm looking for the best performing option that keeps client session > persistence to the back-end servers. > > Any input is appreciated. > > Kind Regards > > > -- > > Robby Pedrica > <https://www.xstore.co.za/index.php/business-documentation-mainmenu-52/118-how-to-generate-an-efficient-support-request> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support > > -- Load balancer distribution - Open Source Project http://www.zenloadbalancer.com Distribution list (subscribe): [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
