yea i notices wa is off the charts. I even did a clean install onto CentOS
still in a VM. It has 2GB or ram, and a raid 5 SAS array with 6 drives. even
though its on a VM, there are no other VMs running at the moment.
With adding a single device, monitoring with zenpulgin.py via ssh and snmp, wa
again went off the charts.
Code:
top - 16:50:55 up 1 day, 41 min, 2 users, load average: 3.08, 3.04, 2.78
Tasks: 78 total, 3 running, 75 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 5.8%us, 0.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 39.9%id, 53.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2048172k total, 2036596k used, 11576k free, 828k buffers
Swap: 5242872k total, 2621436k used, 2621436k free, 13444k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1683 zenoss 16 0 51620 9.9m 1908 R 8 0.5 225:35.82 .python.bin
1818 zenoss 15 0 1086m 21m 1548 S 1 1.1 55:34.96 .python.bin
1592 mysql 18 0 116m 5752 2520 S 1 0.3 3:16.28 mysqld.bin
1739 zenoss 16 0 1977m 1.7g 1368 S 0 86.4 118:11.81 .python.bin
1 root 15 0 2080 336 316 S 0 0.0 0:00.07 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.03 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.01 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
5 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.05 events/0
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
7 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.01 xenwatch
10 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 xenbus
18 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.04 migration/1
19 root 35 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1
20 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1
21 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 events/1
mwcotton wrote:
> 62.3%wa ( wait on io )
> probably not a good idea to run in a vm unless your rrd's are on seperate
> physical disk or san.
[/code]
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.zenoss.com/viewtopic.php?p=29237#29237
-------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
