Since C++ developers are used to reading from an istream and writing to an ostream, the suggestion makes a lot of sense.
On Jul 27, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote: > Nicholas Piël wrote: > >> Maybe a better naming would be, instream, outstream > > I like it. It addresses exactly the problem people are having, namely: > "What's UP and what's DOWN?" > > IN and OUT is unambiguous as opposed to UP and DOWN. > > Moreover, migration from old names is pretty straightforward: > UPSTREAM->INSTREAM, DOWNSTREAM->OUTSTREAM. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
