On 7/27/2010 6:20 AM, Matt Weinstein wrote: > Yeah, you're right, it's too early in the morning here. > > So, is this really ZMQ_INPiPE and ZMQ_OUTPIPE? > > (Or for those in more liberal countries -- ZMQ_PIPE_INHALE and > ZMQ_PIPE_EXHALE? :-) ) > As I mentioned before - that contraction has the disadvantage of sounding like it only supports named pipes :) (ZMQ_BONG_INHALE? :)
- Oliver _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
