> I do agree with this at some level. 0MQ occupies a very odd position in the > network stack. In some ways it is very low-level (connectionless, raw bytes > wire protocol) and in other ways it is very high-level (load balancing, qos, > etc.). At the same time all other solutions I have used are high-level and > low-level in all the wrong place.
Dont think with socket concept. It is "Message Queue". That's why you need load-balancing and QOS. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
