Martin Sustrik wrote: > But it somehow doesn't seem right. What 0MQ does (aside of basic > session-related functionality) is obviously not an application logic. > That's why I use to refer to it as a "new layer in the networking > stack", namely a "scalability layer" (L8?).
Thinking about it some more, it can be considered an L5 layer (given that the definition of L5 is interpreted rather widely). Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
