On 27 September 2010 23:03, Alexey Ermakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Handling removal of topics isn't a problem — I already do that and it works > just fine. My concern with the lack of disconnect() call is that 1) 0MQ may > spend resources sustaining this connection or endlessly reconnecting to it > (in case the server has been shutdown) and 2) in the current model, SUB > sockets still receive everything sent to the PUB socket so I'll needlessly > waste traffic. > > So this sounds like it would be an efficient mechanism to dynamically update the underlying routing of the 0MQ sockets, for instance when having complicated 0MQ devices. I'm thinking of a UI map of devices and adding and removing satellite offices. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
