> Great! I would suggest adding a link to your project to www.zeromq.org. It's > wiki, so you can do so yourself.
Gladly, done. > I am not familiar with CLR. Doesn't the problem the context is solving (i.e. > zeromq being used from two libraries that are later on linked into a single > application and step on each other toes) occur with .NET as well? That is a very good question that I don't know if I can answer. I figured the problem it was solving essentially boiled down to "no global variables". Where is there an opportunity for undesirable interaction? > A side issue: Wouldn't it make sense for you clrzmq, clrzmq2, NZMQ and > Interop guys to at least start working on integration of all the projects? I > mean, writing the code is easy, maintaining it and fixing the bugs is hard. > If the projects are integrated into a single one you could support four time > more features, fix four time more bug, make the whole binding four times more > stable. Aside of that, having a community is much more fun than working alone > :) I'd be up for it. How active is clrzmq2? NZMQ seems to have stalled 3-4 months ago. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
