> For example, the names of inproc endpoints are stored in the context. If 
> library A uses inproc endpoint named X and library B accidentally uses 
> endpoint X as well, they start messining with each other.

That's a very good point, I'll definitely have to address that. I'm willing to 
jump through hoops to keep automatic context management, since it's such a 
perfect fit for RAII-esque language features, and API simplicity was my main 
motivation for a rewrite. Are there any other specific points of contention you 
can think off off-hand, or are there any fundamental issues that completely 
prevent it from working stably this way?
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to