> For example, the names of inproc endpoints are stored in the context. If > library A uses inproc endpoint named X and library B accidentally uses > endpoint X as well, they start messining with each other.
That's a very good point, I'll definitely have to address that. I'm willing to jump through hoops to keep automatic context management, since it's such a perfect fit for RAII-esque language features, and API simplicity was my main motivation for a rewrite. Are there any other specific points of contention you can think off off-hand, or are there any fundamental issues that completely prevent it from working stably this way? _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
