Hi Vladimir, > Again, I see no contradiction with 0MQ. Sure, it would be impractical to > implement actors using REQ/REP, because PUSH/PULL semantics is more > suitable for this. Though when defining the API for hypothetical actor > library you may completely hide these details (like 0MQ socket > types/messaging patterns) from the user. Then this API will export only > one type of communication: fire-and-forget style.
AFAIU that would mean you would have to have a separate 0MQ socket for each peer, i.e. only 1-to-1 communication. Which makes 0MQ kind of useless. You could use TCP instead pretty well. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
