Martin, ZeroMQ adds a whole lot over TCP even for point to point connections. You don't *have* to use other patterns.
-Pieter On 8 Feb 2011 11:00, "Martin Sustrik" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > >> Again, I see no contradiction with 0MQ. Sure, it would be impractical to >> implement actors using REQ/REP, because PUSH/PULL semantics is more >> suitable for this. Though when defining the API for hypothetical actor >> library you may completely hide these details (like 0MQ socket >> types/messaging patterns) from the user. Then this API will export only >> one type of communication: fire-and-forget style. > > AFAIU that would mean you would have to have a separate 0MQ socket for > each peer, i.e. only 1-to-1 communication. Which makes 0MQ kind of > useless. You could use TCP instead pretty well. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
