On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:27, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > The idea is to always use unique release numbers, and tag them to > indicate their maturity.
I might be alone in this, but I've found the treatment of 2.1.8-rc1 pretty confusing. E.g. in my expectations any rc is always followed by an actual release of the same version numbers. If you want to uniquely version releases, that's nice too, but then it would be more sensible (to me) to unpublish the release candidate from e.g. the downloads page. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
