On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Garrett Smith <g...@rre.tt> wrote: > I'm of the opinion that "release candidates" are a vestige of time > when releases were more expensive (e.g. burnt to CDs) and that the > intent was to get everything just right. That's just not the way > things work these days.
Indeed. > I can't recall who does this, but one of the major projects uses an > even-odd scheme to manage stable vs development lineages. E.g. the > even releases have are more conservative and odd more relaxed. We used to do that, no-one understood it, and we stopped doing it. And it didn't match how we work anyhow, which is to create branches that reach maturity each in their own little curve. > In any case, I personally don't care for the "rc" tag and am fine with > rolling releases, some of which are more stable than others -- in the > end, it's the list of known issues and release notes that matter. Ack. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
