Personally I'd reuse JZMQ and make the low-level API a part of the new project. Over time you probably want to implement the HL classes directly over libzmq, and you can eventually deprecate the low-level API totally.
-Pieter On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any naming suggestions for the project? > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> If you guys define this new API, which I suppose will be implemented atop >>> jzmq, we could also add it as a separate package to jzmq itself. Or maybe >>> it should be a separate project on github. Anyway, I am open to anything we >>> all agree on. >> >> I'm OK with either option. John has already made a couple of >> suggestions in the gist I posted earlier. > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
