On 16 October 2013 10:25, Laurent Alebarde <l.aleba...@free.fr> wrote:

>  A simplier approach is to encapsulate the standard clock of your choice
> and save in a static member the value of the last get. Then if the standard
> clock goes back in time, you return the saved value + 1.
>

For clock drift this is fine, one doesn't even have to bother with the
increment for many cases.  However there can be major problems with NTP,
daylight savings, and suspend/hibernation states.

-- 
Steve-o
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to