uuid's are 16 octets long, so you can just use char[16] as the datatype for it. If you are happen to be using boost, it's uuid type has a data which is defined that way.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Riskybiz <riskybizl...@live.com> wrote: > Is it these lines which are the problem with c_str() in the Paranoid > Pirate > Queue? > > msg.push_front((char*)identity.c_str()); > > msg.wrap (it->identity.c_str(), NULL); > > What can be done to fix the problem, not using uuid identifiers? Replacing > uuids in the Paranoid Pirate Queue code with calls to s_set_id ()? > > But it begs the question; how should the uuid identifiers be properly > handled and passed around in code? Surely Paranoid Pirate pattern must > have > worked with uuids at some point in time otherwise how would it have passed > muster for the zeromq guide? > > Confused. > > Riskybiz. > > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 06:15:54 +0800 > From: KIU Shueng Chuan <nixch...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Paranoid Pirate > To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org> > Message-ID: > <CAP2skc-= > rlz92jxpxsavmlfqrgapjmojh9qn+b1yulaxfny...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > The zmsg class api takes in char* and the pirate queue has code that passes > it identities as c_str(). This doesn't work since identities are not nul > terminated c strings and may contain nuls. > > It works for the workers only because they explicitly set their own id to > something containing only characters. See s_set_id (). > On 26 Aug 2014 04:33, "Riskybiz" <riskybizl...@live.com> wrote: > > > Dear zeromq developers, > > > > > > > > I'm trying to get the Paranoid Pirate pattern to > > operate on Debian Linux using zeromq-4.0.4. (When I get it working on > > Linux then I will turn my attention to making it work on Windows). > > The Paranoid Pirate Queue <http://pastebin.com/KTsn4Yq8> and the > > Paranoid Pirate Worker <http://pastebin.com/hLHRC2LB> are > > communicating and demonstrably heartbeating. The problem is that the > > Lazy Pirate Client <http://pastebin.com/Ekd1ZGQF> does not appear to > > communicate properly or receive a reply message. Is anyone able to > identify what is wrong here? > > There are a couple of other necessary files; zhelpers.h > > <http://pastebin.com/ir8bkQaU> and zmsg.hpp > > <http://pastebin.com/4KYir507> . > > > > I have changed int64_t more = 0; to int more = 0; as kindly pointed > > out by KIU Shueng Chuan as being necessary for zeromq-3.2.x and > > higher. Also added are some console print statements to trace what is > > actually going on. In order to correct very long waiting times I have > > modified the delay periods built in to the pattern from those provided > > by the stock example in the zeromq guide. > > > > Hope someone is able to help. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Riskybiz. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > > http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20140826/03acd436/a > ttachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > End of zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 80, Issue 24 > ****************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
