280 threads sounds fine unless you have data showing that it's a
problem. That's easy to test on your target platform.

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Bob Clarke <optiongu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Platform: 0MQ 4.0.4 on Windows 7/Windows Server 2008
>
> I am writing a server monitoring program to replace an ancient (1999)
> program that is almost impossible to maintain.
>
> All of our application servers host proprietary Windows services written in
> C++ (except for a couple .Net apps) that use a proprietary synchronous
> request/response system (it works very well, has been for many years, and
> isn't being replaced any time soon).
>
> The monitoring program sends test scripts to the server apps and waits for a
> reply. In most cases, the reply is almost immediate, but in some cases,
> there could be a delay of up to 30 seconds. So, to avoid one script causing
> delays with others, each test script runs in its own thread. This thread
> must send its results back to a listener, so it creates and uses a 0MQ
> socket to do so. Each test script has a repeat interval; some are run every
> five seconds, but most are run every 45 seconds, 90 seconds, or less
> frequently.
>
> There are about 280 test scripts (we have thousands of servers across three
> data centers), so I seem to have two unfortunate choices:
> 1) Keep the script threads around so I'm not creating and destroying a
> socket each time a test runs;
> 2) Let the script threads terminate so I am not keeping 280 threads open at
> once. Since the script repeat intervals are quite long in computer terms,
> these threads will spend most of their time do nothing.
>
> I lean towards the first option, but opening and closing sockets that often
> doesn't sound good. Then again, keeping 280+ threads around doesn't sound so
> great, either.
>
> So before I go too far down this development road, does anyone have some
> experience they could share?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to