If the 'xyre' naming scheme isn't acceptable, then I'd suggest a totally different name, outside the zmq/zyre schemes.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Arnaud Loonstra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if people have followed the discussion on the Pyre github. > It seems there is another project called Pyre. Therefore there's a > discussion for renaming Pyre in order to have it listed on Pypi. > > https://github.com/zeromq/pyre/issues/14 > > I'm personally not so much troubled by not being listed on Pypi but as > more people get involved this is of more importance. > Suggested names are now: just zyre, pyzyre however these also conflict > with existing zmq projects. > > Another note about this. As zyre python bindings are generated nowadays > I would like the python zyre module to detect whether it can access the > C library or revert to the native python zyre (Pyre). This is being done > for a lot of python modules. (i.e. > http://api.mongodb.org/python/current/api/pymongo/index.html#pymongo.has_c) > > Does anybody have any suggestions, objections, advice etc? > > Rg, > > Arnaud > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
