What about simply pzyre? On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > If the 'xyre' naming scheme isn't acceptable, then I'd suggest a > totally different name, outside the zmq/zyre schemes. > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Arnaud Loonstra <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't know if people have followed the discussion on the Pyre github. >> It seems there is another project called Pyre. Therefore there's a >> discussion for renaming Pyre in order to have it listed on Pypi. >> >> https://github.com/zeromq/pyre/issues/14 >> >> I'm personally not so much troubled by not being listed on Pypi but as >> more people get involved this is of more importance. >> Suggested names are now: just zyre, pyzyre however these also conflict >> with existing zmq projects. >> >> Another note about this. As zyre python bindings are generated nowadays >> I would like the python zyre module to detect whether it can access the >> C library or revert to the native python zyre (Pyre). This is being done >> for a lot of python modules. (i.e. >> http://api.mongodb.org/python/current/api/pymongo/index.html#pymongo.has_c) >> >> Does anybody have any suggestions, objections, advice etc? >> >> Rg, >> >> Arnaud >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-- Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
