Trevor,

I see from http://zeromq.org/docs:tuning-zeromq#toc1 that OS/X has a
low default limit on file handles. Could be this. Zyre test cases tend
to consume a lot of file handles...

-Pieter

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I was able to reliably recreate your error using JeroMQ on my MBP
> though I have yet to try on a Linux. When I did use JZMQ with
> libzmq-4.1.3, I would get: Resource temporarily unavailable
> (src/signaler.cpp:301) after a certain point in time. I'm wondering if
> this is mac specific? I'll set up a VM and retry the tests.
>
> -Trev
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Trevor Bernard
> <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> Building JZMQ is pretty straight forward:
>>
>> $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make && sudo ldconfig && mvn install
>> -Dgpg.skip=true
>>
>> I submitted a few patches to jyre this morning that made jeromq the
>> default. Also, if you want to test with JZMQ, you can just use the
>> follow branch in my fork:
>> https://github.com/trevorbernard/jyre/tree/jzmq
>>
>> You will need to mvn install jyre as well.
>>
>> I made some changes to your test here:
>> https://github.com/trevorbernard/jyre-standalone-benchmark
>>
>> I made the counters thread safe and I changed the gradle build to look
>> for artifacts in ~/.m2/repository
>>
>> Let me know how your testing goes.
>>
>> -Trev
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA)
>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After talking with Pieter, I'm going to first do the test with a JNI 
>>> wrapper for the zre lib.  If anyone has built such a wrapper and is willing 
>>> to share, please let me know :)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org 
>>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Utsav Drolia
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:17 AM
>>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>>>
>>> Could you check where the messages do get dropped?
>>> Specifically, is there a buffer overflow at the pipe between the 
>>> ZreInterface and the Agent?
>>>
>>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA) 
>>>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I simplified a bit and now explicitly wait for all responders to JOIN but 
>>>> I'm getting the same results.  I can't see any real difference between 
>>>> your test and mine.  I think my test is correct unless I'm doing something 
>>>> really dumb that I can't see.
>>>>
>>>> Incidentally, if I lower the pause to 0, the ZreInterface.send() starts 
>>>> blocking, which I think is the behavior we'd expect.
>>>>
>>>> We prefer to use the pure java version of Zyre so that we can use it in 
>>>> Android.  We'll use the C library for other platforms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Adam Wynne
>>>> CR/RTC3.1-NA
>>>>
>>>> Tel. +1(412)390-3211
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
>>>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter
>>>> Hintjens
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 3:30 AM
>>>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>>>>
>>>> It might be a Jyre issue yet the most likely seems an issue in your test 
>>>> case (the loss is so dramatic). What I'd do is simplify it, and see when 
>>>> it starts happening.
>>>>
>>>> If you are able to write a JNI layer then we could eventually wrap the 
>>>> Zyre C API in Java.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA) 
>>>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>>>>> OK.  Do you think it's a problem in Jyre or JeroMQ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam Wynne
>>>>> CR/RTC3.1-NA
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel. +1(412)390-3211
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
>>>>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter
>>>>> Hintjens
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:19 PM
>>>>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>>>>>
>>>>> So here's a C test case that does this:
>>>>> https://gist.github.com/hintjens/d54d25c30e0339fb0a87
>>>>>
>>>>> I do get message loss if I (a) start broadcasting before all nodes are 
>>>>> ready or (b) don't wait for all messages to return. Otherwise it works 
>>>>> even with no pause between message sends.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Pieter
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Adam,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm recreating this test case in C/Zyre to see how it performs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Pieter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA)
>>>>>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are evaluating Jyre for use in a project and are doing some
>>>>>>> benchmark testing.  We found that at higher send rates, some
>>>>>>> messages appear to get lost.  I have created a github project with
>>>>>>> multiple “nodes” running in their own threads to demonstrate the
>>>>>>> issue.  I included a README in the project that describes the test
>>>>>>> scenario and how to run it so it’s easy to run the test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/awynne/jyre-standalone-benchmark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any ideas and/or are able to look into 
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam Wynne
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bosch Research and Technology Ctr.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to