Hi Trev,

I was able to manually configure the pom to use jzmq and run the jyre
tests.  Let me know if you have some fancy way of switching between the two
implementations.

Also, how are you specifying the java.library.path?  Is it something in an
env var or your settings.xml that I can't see?  I did it by adding a -D
option to the pom, with a different profile for each os as in this commit:
https://github.com/awynne/jyre/commit/77a390e6225a8954079b61b5108a8d89adc6a12b.
But maybe you have a better way...

thanks
Adam

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 8:29 AM Adam Wynne <awy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Trevor,
>
> Thanks for the message.  How do I tell jyre to use jzmq?  I don't see any
> System.loadLibrary("libjzmq") call anywhere in jyre or anything in the pom
> that could be used to switch between the two.
>
> thanks
> Adam
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:40 PM Trevor Bernard <trevor.bern...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I was able to get it running with JZMQ. I updated Jyre so it's so that
>> jeromq and jzmq can be used interchangeably. Also, if you're building
>> your own JNI wrapper, you can likely use this as a base:
>> https://github.com/trevorbernard/zmq-jni . It uses CMake instead of
>> autotools and it's a very simple wrapper. It also integrates cmake
>> into the maven build process.
>>
>> -Trev
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA)
>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Trev,
>> >
>> > Thanks much for the help.  I am currently writing a jni wrapper for
>> libzyre b/c Pieter thought that was the fastest way to take advantage of
>> improvements in libzyre.  But I'm also really interested to try the
>> performance testing with jyre/jzmq as well.  Let me know if you get such a
>> test running.
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [mailto:
>> zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Bernard
>> > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 11:10 AM
>> > To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>> >
>> > Adam,
>> >
>> > I was able to reliably recreate your error using JeroMQ on my MBP
>> though I have yet to try on a Linux. When I did use JZMQ with libzmq-4.1.3,
>> I would get: Resource temporarily unavailable
>> > (src/signaler.cpp:301) after a certain point in time. I'm wondering if
>> this is mac specific? I'll set up a VM and retry the tests.
>> >
>> > -Trev
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Trevor Bernard <
>> trevor.bern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Adam,
>> >>
>> >> Building JZMQ is pretty straight forward:
>> >>
>> >> $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make && sudo ldconfig && mvn install
>> >> -Dgpg.skip=true
>> >>
>> >> I submitted a few patches to jyre this morning that made jeromq the
>> >> default. Also, if you want to test with JZMQ, you can just use the
>> >> follow branch in my fork:
>> >> https://github.com/trevorbernard/jyre/tree/jzmq
>> >>
>> >> You will need to mvn install jyre as well.
>> >>
>> >> I made some changes to your test here:
>> >> https://github.com/trevorbernard/jyre-standalone-benchmark
>> >>
>> >> I made the counters thread safe and I changed the gradle build to look
>> >> for artifacts in ~/.m2/repository
>> >>
>> >> Let me know how your testing goes.
>> >>
>> >> -Trev
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA)
>> >> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>> After talking with Pieter, I'm going to first do the test with a JNI
>> >>> wrapper for the zre lib.  If anyone has built such a wrapper and is
>> >>> willing to share, please let me know :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Adam
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Utsav
>> >>> Drolia
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:17 AM
>> >>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>> >>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>> >>>
>> >>> Could you check where the messages do get dropped?
>> >>> Specifically, is there a buffer overflow at the pipe between the
>> ZreInterface and the Agent?
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sep 2, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA) <
>> adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I simplified a bit and now explicitly wait for all responders to
>> JOIN but I'm getting the same results.  I can't see any real difference
>> between your test and mine.  I think my test is correct unless I'm doing
>> something really dumb that I can't see.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Incidentally, if I lower the pause to 0, the ZreInterface.send()
>> starts blocking, which I think is the behavior we'd expect.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We prefer to use the pure java version of Zyre so that we can use it
>> in Android.  We'll use the C library for other platforms.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best regards
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Adam Wynne
>> >>>> CR/RTC3.1-NA
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Tel. +1(412)390-3211
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter
>> >>>> Hintjens
>> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 3:30 AM
>> >>>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It might be a Jyre issue yet the most likely seems an issue in your
>> test case (the loss is so dramatic). What I'd do is simplify it, and see
>> when it starts happening.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you are able to write a JNI layer then we could eventually wrap
>> the Zyre C API in Java.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA) <
>> adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> OK.  Do you think it's a problem in Jyre or JeroMQ?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Best regards
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Adam Wynne
>> >>>>> CR/RTC3.1-NA
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Tel. +1(412)390-3211
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>>> From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>>> [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter
>> >>>>> Hintjens
>> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:19 PM
>> >>>>> To: ZeroMQ development list <zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org>
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] message loss at high send rate in Jyre
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So here's a C test case that does this:
>> >>>>> https://gist.github.com/hintjens/d54d25c30e0339fb0a87
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I do get message loss if I (a) start broadcasting before all nodes
>> are ready or (b) don't wait for all messages to return. Otherwise it works
>> even with no pause between message sends.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -Pieter
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi Adam,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I'm recreating this test case in C/Zyre to see how it performs.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -Pieter
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA)
>> >>>>>> <adam.wy...@us.bosch.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> We are evaluating Jyre for use in a project and are doing some
>> >>>>>>> benchmark testing.  We found that at higher send rates, some
>> >>>>>>> messages appear to get lost.  I have created a github project
>> >>>>>>> with multiple “nodes” running in their own threads to demonstrate
>> >>>>>>> the issue.  I included a README in the project that describes the
>> >>>>>>> test scenario and how to run it so it’s easy to run the test.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/awynne/jyre-standalone-benchmark
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any ideas and/or are able to look
>> into it.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Best regards
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Adam Wynne
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Bosch Research and Technology Ctr.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>>>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
>> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to