http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/may/29cbp.htm


Is the elite blocking India's new social order?

Chandra Bhan Prasad | May 29, 2007 | 12:42 IST

In societies the world over, the elite speak through the media.
Polished and sophisticated, the media graduates into the collective
voice of the elite.
India has a very formidable media establishment, and that is expanding
at a very rapid speed. Though a welcome sign of a society under
transition, the Indian media as it expands in terms of its reach, it
shrinks even further in terms of objectivity.

'Will the BSP now step out of Uttar Pradesh to grow into a national
party?' Questions such as these are often lobbed. In other words, to
the Indian media, the Bahujan Samaj Party remains a UP-centric party
with some symbolic presence here and there. Is that the truth?

How far and different in terms of distance, culture and demography the
Andaman and Nicobar islands are from Lucknow. In the Lok Sabha
election of 2004, the BSP candidate polled 1,122 votes in the Andaman
& Nicobar islands Lok Sabha seat.

Darjeeling is equally far from the Andaman & Nicobar islands, but in
West Bengal's Darjeeling Lok Sabha seat, the BSP candidate polled
10,752 votes. Tamil Nadu's Tirunelveli district can be culturally an
altogether an alien planet from Darjeeling, but the BSP candidate in
the Tirunelveli Lok Sabha seat polled 3,606 votes in 2004.

In the deep central Indian Lok Sabha constituency of Balaghat in
Madhya Pradesh, the BSP candidate polled 72,391 votes in 2004. In far
southeast Thiruvananthapuram, the BSP candidate polled 3,831 votes. In
far west Jamnagar in Gujarat, the BSP candidate polled 5,306 votes. In
the sleepy desert Lok Sabha constituency of Barmer in Rajasthan, the
BSP candidate polled 19,616 votes. And in the very heart of south
India, in the Gulbarga Lok Sabha constituency of Karnataka, the BSP
candidate polled 26,725 votes.

Though the Indian media will not inform the public, the BSP, barring
the Northeast, has evolved into an authentic all India party.

Brahmins in their paradise of the Gangetic belt have now accepted
Mayawati as their leader, and its echoes are being felt beyond the
BSP's region of triumph. Mahant Sudhirdas Pujari, the head priest of
Nashik's Kalaram temple, has joined the BSP to replicate UP's
Dalit-Brahmin thesis in Maharashtra.

It is worth recalling that Mahant Sudhirdas is the grandson of
Ramdasbuva Pujari, who as the head priest of the Kalaram temple, had
shut the temple's door when Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar launched his
historic temple entry movement on March 2, 1930. Mahant Sudhirdas now
apologises for his grandfather's landmark mistake.

Present day India is undergoing a spectacular social churning where
society is demanding a new social contract. This new social contract,
in turn, insists on a new social consensus where Dalits ought to be
the leaders. The terms and conditions of this social contract are to
be decided by the Dalits themselves. The Brahmin -- the average
Brahmin to be precise -- is consenting to this new social contract.

The two national castes, the Dalits and Brahmins, are the logical
legatees of Indian democracy. Pre-destined by their demographic spread
and various other social factors, Dalits and Brahmins alone have the
inner strength to own up pan-India as the land for all -- an all
inclusive nation-State.

The Brahmins' predicament is history contextualised where they lack
moral authority to lead India. As makers of a divisive and innately
hierarchical social order, Brahmins in their self-belief are a
partisan social class, suspected by all. The non-Brahmins -- Shudras
or the Other Backward Classes -- to be precise got a mandate to lead
India after the Mandal movement. None but the OBCs themselves betrayed
that mandate.

In post-Mandal India, the OBCs got a mandate to de-caste India and
build it on egalitarian lines. Constrained by a host of
socio-psychological factors, the OBCs misinterpreted that Mandal
mandate and began reconstructing the order of social hegemony. The
Brahmin hegemony to be replaced by the hegemony of the OBCs.

This went against the mandate accorded to them in post-Mandal India.
The consensus collapsed in less than two decades, and the OBCs lost
the moral authority to rule and lead India.

Now, neither are the Brahmins acceptable to the OBCs nor the OBCs to
Brahmins. But some social class must govern and lead India. The choice
fell on the Dalits -- a third party arbitrator. That exceptional
social mood was reflected in the UP assembly election where the
society on its own chose Mayawati to rule the state, and if possible,
extend that logic to an all India basis.

There are roadblocks though. India's elite, still rooted in its past
and condemned by a arrogant regime, finds itself unprepared to consent
to the already evolving new social consensus. As erstwhile rulers, the
Indian elite continues to rule the urban economy, the centres of
knowledge, media, new professions, culture, and hence,
self-consciously, remain rulers of India. Needless to say, the elite
are hopelessly far removed from political realities.

Economically marginalised, politically despised, and ideologically
isolated, the average Brahmin along with its Rajput, Baniya and
Kayastha associates, has been feeling the heat for over a
decade-and-a-half. Mayawati's call of solidarity has galvanised them
into a new social force.

While the average Brahmin is mandating a new future history for India,
and hence a new social consensus, the elite seem to be blocking the
same. By implication, the arrogant-affluent elite is putting
roadblocks in the march of history, and that of democracy.

To make India a better place to live, the elite must modernise and
moderate its conscience. That is the new aspiration of history. While
Dalits are prepared to take the role history is demanding, the elite
have to decide their own role and responsibility. Shouldn't the elite
think of India as well -- a new nation-State -- all inclusive, vibrant
and futuristic? Through its mouthpiece -- the mass media, the elite
must now speak up a new language.

Dr Chandra Bhan Prasad will contribute a regular column to rediff.com

Reply via email to